AI automation · India · US · Europe
AI automation your business can afford.Built by the team that runs it in production.
Voice agents, chatbots, autonomous workers, conversational analytics — production-grade automation for companies that were told it costs six figures. We publish our prices, deploy into your live environment, and put a third of our fee behind the result.
The cost of carrying on
Your team isn't slow. The work between the work is.
Nobody you hired wants to re-key the same order into a second system, chase a status across four threads, or answer the same customer question for the ninth time this week. That work still gets done — it just gets done by people you hired for something else.
0%
of global GDP lost to low engagement — about $10 trillion a year
Source: Gallup, State of the Global Workplace 2026 ↗0%
of the workday goes to work about work — chasing status, hunting for information, redoing what was already done
Source: Asana, Anatomy of Work Index 2021 ↗0%
median gap in quality defects between a company's best and worst teams — same company, same work
Source: Gallup, Q12 Meta-Analysis, 11th Edition (2024) ↗None of it shows up as a line item. It shows up as slow quotes, dropped follow-ups, and good people quietly checking out.
The arrangement
We define the number before we write code.
The metric comes first
Before anything is built we agree one sentence describing what has to move, and we only accept metrics already instrumented in your systems. If measuring it requires building the measurement, it is the wrong metric and we will say so.
Seventy / thirty
Seventy per cent of the fee is fixed. Thirty per cent is contingent on that metric moving by the agreed threshold within ninety days of go-live. We cap the contingent portion deliberately — a firm that bets the whole project makes reckless decisions near the deadline.
Your delay is not our risk
If agreed data access, environment access or subject-matter time slips past the dates in the statement of work, the contingent portion converts to fixed. Most outcome-pricing disputes are caused by client-side delay, and pretending otherwise would make the clause dishonest.
We publish the earn rate
How often we actually collect the contingent third is on this page, updated quarterly, including the quarters it goes badly. An agency with two hundred billable staff cannot afford to do this. That is the point.
What it costs
Published, because not publishing is the tell.
Two thirds of the category refuses to state a price. Affordable is a claim anyone can make — publishing the numbers is the only version of it that costs anything. Here are ours.
Deployment Audit
$5,000 – $15,000
2–3 weeks · fixed · credited against the build
Three to five candidate workflows scored for whether they can actually reach production. You leave with a defined success metric per workflow, the instrumentation plan to measure it, and a go/no-go we are willing to put in writing — including “don't build this”.
- Scored workflow shortlist
- One-sentence metric definition per workflow
- Instrumentation plan
- Written go / no-go
Production Sprint
$40,000 – $120,000
6–12 weeks · 70% fixed / 30% contingent
One workflow, deployed into your live environment, measured against the metric agreed in the audit. This is the rung the rest of the market struggles to sell, and the only reason we can is that a third of our fee is standing behind it.
- Deployed and integrated agent
- Cost governance and hard kill-switch
- Live metric instrumentation
- 90-day contingent clause
Managed Operations
$8,000 – $30,000 / mo
Rolling · 30 days' notice
Agents fail after launch, not at launch — drift, cost creep, edge cases, model changes. Almost nobody in this category sells the aftercare, which is a strange thing to omit from a market with a 95% failure rate.
- Monitoring and drift management
- Cost governance and escalation
- Model and prompt maintenance
- Quarterly expansion review
Our numbers
The figures a star rating cannot carry.
Published quarterly, including the quarters that go badly, with the sample size attached. If a figure is missing here it is because we do not have it yet — not because it was unflattering.
- Still running at 90 days
- Share of deployments live three months after go-live
- Contingent third earned
- How often we collect the outcome fee
- Median time to production
- Signature to live, in weeks
- Engagements declined
- Audits that ended in “don't build this”
Track record
Systems that have already run against real money.
Gartner attributes cancelled agent projects to escalating cost, unclear value and inadequate risk controls — not to model capability. Those are the three things we had to solve years ago, in production, before any of this had a marketing vocabulary.
10.1M+
rows in a live analytics pipeline
An eight-stage battery-degradation engine over 8.46M telemetry and 1.68M GPS rows across 285 vehicles, with a root-cause classifier that separates component defect from driver behaviour. Warranty disputes are settled on its output.
Per-call
cost tracking and a hard kill-switch
A multi-provider voice system with per-call cost attribution, deduplication, transcript intent scoring and an operator kill-switch. This is what “escalating costs” and “inadequate risk controls” look like once they have been solved rather than described.
Regulated
identity and verification rails, in production
Document verification, e-signature and credit-bureau integration with full audit logging and co-borrower flows, running inside a lending environment where a wrong answer has a legal consequence.
Who we turn down
We are wrong for most people who contact us.
A firm that lists every industry and every service is telling you it has no opinion. Ours costs us revenue to publish.
Anyone shopping on hourly rate
We do not sell hours and will lose that comparison on purpose. If the evaluation is a rate card, we are the wrong call.
Work where the outcome cannot be measured
If nothing in your systems already counts the thing that should improve, the contingent clause is theatre. We would rather decline than sell a guarantee that cannot be settled.
Strategy decks and AI workshops
We do not sell readiness assessments as a destination. The audit exists to reach a build decision, and it is credited against the build.
Staff augmentation
Engineers rented by the month is a different business with different incentives. Ours only works if we own the outcome end to end.
Before you talk to anyone
Will your project reach production?
Six questions, scored out of thirty, against what actually stops automation reaching production: whether the outcome is measurable, whether the data exists, whether a named owner has authority, whether the workflow has an exception path, whether cost is bounded, and whether anyone can switch it off. Answer them below — the result appears immediately, no email required, and it will sometimes tell you not to hire us.
- 01
Can you name, in one sentence, the number this should move?
- 02
Could someone hand over the data and system access next week?
- 03
Is there one person accountable for this working, with authority to change how the work is done?
- 04
When the automation cannot handle a case, what happens to it?
- 05
Do you know what this may cost to run per month, and is there a ceiling?
- 06
Can a non-engineer stop it, immediately, without a deploy?
— / 30
Answer all six and the result appears here — no email required.